Nabil Luqman

0f9d2dd4f71434084e2b6094de1865e23abb37bb9f28ca51feeabee679ec9be2

Social

Money

crime

Singapore

Johor

foreigner

subsidy

guilty

RON95

budi95

Malaysia's crackdown on the misuse of subsidised fuel has resulted in one of its first successful prosecutions under stricter enforcement rules, after a Singaporean driver was fined RM20,000 for illegally purchasing RON95 petrol in Johor.
The case serves as a reminder that while Malaysia's subsidised RON95 fuel is significantly cheaper than premium petrol, it is reserved exclusively for eligible Malaysian motorists and cannot be purchased by foreign-registered vehicles.
Singaporean Driver Pleads Guilty
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/816c0128f8387d17fbab56b4ecb68ea1822fb44208461df92c2845a367077543" />
The man, who is in his 50s, pleaded guilty at the Johor Bahru Sessions Court after being caught filling his Singapore-registered Honda Civic with subsidised RON95 petrol at a petrol station on 9 April.
The offence was uncovered during Op Tiris 4.0, an enforcement operation carried out by officers from the Ministry of Domestic Trade and Cost of Living (KPDN).
Sessions Court Judge Datuk Che Wan Zaidi Che Wan Ibrahim sentenced him to a RM20,000 fine, with an additional three-month jail term if he failed to pay. According to local reports, the driver settled the fine on the very same day.
Why Foreign Vehicles Cannot Buy RON95
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/a14f673653dfc027a26aa21093d5dbdfb4fbd3e0a8be0a769e3f1a557d07e800" />
Malaysia has prohibited foreign-registered vehicles from purchasing subsidised RON95 petrol since 2010.
The subsidy exists to ensure Malaysian taxpayers benefit from government-funded fuel assistance, with eligible Malaysians currently paying RM1.99 per litre for RON95.
Drivers of foreign-registered vehicles are instead required to purchase RON97, which is sold at market prices.
While the restriction has existed for years, enforcement has become significantly stricter since 1 April 2026.
Previously, legal action was primarily taken against petrol station operators found selling subsidised fuel to foreign vehicles. However, under the revised enforcement measures, authorities can now prosecute both petrol station operators and the owners or drivers of foreign-registered vehicles.
This Johor case is believed to be among the first prosecutions under the tougher approach.
Authorities: Subsidies Must Reach The Right People
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/3c7e3a6b0c6c09110bf80bb66cd6e19e8d6c4a585bb42fd5bf28561ee4b19d43" />
Johor KPDN director Lilis Saslinda Pornomo said the successful prosecution demonstrates the government's continued commitment to preventing the misuse of controlled goods.
She explained that enforcing the regulations helps protect consumer interests while ensuring Malaysia's subsidised fuel remains available for those it is intended to benefit.
Authorities also reminded the public that purchasing subsidised fuel using a foreign-registered vehicle is an offence under the Control of Supplies Act 1961.
Under the law, first-time offenders can face fines of up to RM1 million, imprisonment of up to three years, or both. Repeat offenders face even harsher penalties, including fines of up to RM3 million and jail terms of up to five years.
Companies or petrol stations found supplying subsidised fuel illegally may also face fines reaching RM2 million, increasing to RM5 million for repeat offences.
A Costly Attempt To Save On Fuel
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/3199f97008424903f1313149810d2f8c4e90a4037fec6357c5f289f9deef9e67" />
Authorities did not reveal how much fuel the driver purchased.
However, the RM20,000 penalty far outweighs any potential savings he could have made by choosing subsidised RON95 instead of RON97.
At the current price of RM4.00 per litre for RON97 in Malaysia, the fine is equivalent to around 5,000 litres of premium petrol &mdash; enough to fill a typical 50-litre passenger vehicle approximately 100 times.
The case highlights just how seriously Malaysian authorities are now treating attempts to misuse the country's fuel subsidy programme.
Malaysia Vs Singapore Fuel Prices
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/42efe1111ab9d55f646d8dbde77dd6b2bc9bb345fdab57ae406d36695e3b1b7c" />
The incident also highlights the significant difference in fuel prices between Malaysia and Singapore.
In Malaysia, eligible motorists currently pay RM1.99 per litre for subsidised RON95, while RON97 costs RM4.00 per litre. Eligible BUDI Diesel recipients are also able to purchase subsidised diesel at RM2.10 per litre.
In comparison, fuel prices in Singapore are considerably higher due to the absence of fuel subsidies, higher taxes and market-based pricing. Based on current pump prices, petrol in Singapore costs approximately RM9.30 to RM11.30 per litre, depending on the fuel grade and retailer, while diesel is priced at roughly RM9.00 to RM9.70 per litre.
The sizeable price gap has long made Malaysia an attractive destination for motorists crossing the border to refuel. However, Malaysian authorities have reiterated that subsidised RON95 is reserved exclusively for eligible Malaysian motorists, with stricter enforcement now targeting both petrol station operators and foreign drivers who attempt to misuse the subsidy.
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

A cheaper tank of petrol turned into a RM20,000 lesson for one Singaporean driver.

9b26b5ac6ca8fe4e1df65ddf98e0e08928b90e936ec3b3e8f39d9303b45f8cf5

Singaporean Driver Fined RM20,000 After Illegally Filling Up With Subsidised RON95 Petrol In Johor

9621255847abc97937372c8dc13279f044806beb1dd21709fd1553c490afe2dd

BIllie Eilish UMMY

cdb6070aabbec308a543cd4adeeb88164255929fcd5130c1f206502017c1c52f

Coke Fifa

38941b1bac42da64a02a23ecc8eb6222efa97c70765b23b6219aa575309b69db

UMMY Sienna Spiro

83825a877c75953ebff3be1a2ab43cd2012f89a4df7cbd22db7ff7c05598b510

Pizza hut Meltz 2026

The declassified Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) report into Lembaga Tabung Haji (TH) has uncovered a troubling picture of how the country's pilgrimage fund continued paying generous staff bonuses and declaring high hibah (profit distributions) despite being in a weak financial position.
Released four years after it was completed, the 211-page report examined TH's management and governance between 2014 and 2020, highlighting governance failures, questionable investment decisions, creative accounting practices and political interference that ultimately placed the institution under severe financial strain.
Bonuses Continued Despite Mounting Losses
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/2cd6482fe4c6d0875e3991d0a4424931047fbc8579d8304e614fb85b516f054d" />
Among the report's most striking findings was that TH continued rewarding employees with substantial bonuses even as its finances deteriorated.
Between 2010 and 2017, staff received bonuses ranging from one to 13 months' salary. In 2014 alone, TH reportedly set aside RM74 million for staff bonuses, comprising an 11-month performance bonus and a two-month special bonus.
However, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), which later reviewed TH's financial position, concluded that the fund had already been operating with an asset-liability deficit since 2014.
The RCI found there was no justification for such generous payouts while the institution was effectively losing money, recommending that the practice be discontinued and that improperly approved bonuses be recovered where appropriate.
The report also highlighted bonus payments made by TH Properties Sdn Bhd in 2017 and 2018, amounting to RM1.15 million and RM1.05 million respectively. According to the commission, these payments breached the Companies Act 2016 as they were approved without the necessary shareholder resolutions and by a committee lacking the authority to do so.
Profits Reported Despite Underlying Losses
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/7c80e03d2184410a156ed4d52f5ee7c3278b924f849c7e73bc68628dba8f74f7" />
The commission found that TH's financial position appeared significantly healthier than it actually was.
For the 2017 financial year, depositors were informed that TH had recorded a profit of RM3.4 billion. However, after applying the appropriate accounting standards, the RCI concluded the fund should instead have reported a loss of approximately RM1.4 billion &mdash; a difference of around RM4.8 billion.
Much of the discrepancy stemmed from the failure to recognise impairment losses on investments whose value had fallen substantially.
PwC estimated that TH had accumulated losses of roughly RM10 billion by 2017, with the fund remaining in deficit for several years before the financial problems became publicly known.
'Creative Accounting' Used To Maintain Hibah Payments
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/3eb9a262180575587c8e21d5fc2accfae136a921d5baa6c28fbb15a3cb715708" />
Despite the deteriorating financial position, TH continued distributing attractive hibah returns to depositors.
Under Section 22 of the Tabung Haji Act 1995, hibah can only be declared if the fund's assets exceed its liabilities.
Instead of relying on audited asset values, however, the RCI found that TH management used a higher internal valuation known as the Realisable Asset Value (RAV), allowing the institution to satisfy the legal requirement on paper while avoiding the recognition of significant impairment losses.
The commission described this as "creative accounting", concluding that TH's 2017 hibah distribution of 4.5%, together with an additional 1.75% haj hibah costing RM2.75 billion, should never have been declared under the audited financial position.
Crime analyst Kamal Affandi Hashim said such accounting practices could indicate deliberate criminal conduct rather than simple administrative mistakes, arguing that manipulating financial statements to conceal losses may expose both those directly involved and those responsible for oversight to potential legal liability.
Warning Signs Were Ignored
The RCI found that several warning signs emerged years before TH's financial issues became public.
Bank Negara Malaysia reportedly issued multiple warning letters to TH between 2014 and 2015 regarding its financial position.
In 2017, international consultancy Roland Berger also warned that TH had been depleting its reserves to maintain hibah payouts and cautioned that the adoption of new accounting standards would expose billions of ringgit in unrealised losses.
However, the report found no evidence that these findings were ever presented to TH's board before the 2018 General Election.
Costly Investments Added To Financial Pressure
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/aa65353e162e04c1fd3b4ddef81393dfbc7e7e9a5bd704331f492dd74a37d03d" />
The commission identified 14 investments that should undergo forensic audits due to governance concerns and significant losses.
Among the largest was TH's investment in FGV Holdings, which resulted in an unrealised loss exceeding RM1.06 billion after the value of its shares fell sharply following the company's 2012 listing.
Other major losses included:
<ul>
<li>RM364.31 million impairment involving Trurich Resources.</li>
<li>RM278 million impairment linked to TH Marine.</li>
<li>RM225 million loss from the Deru Semangat plantation project after environmental issues affected buyers' confidence.</li>
<li>RM170 million impairment involving TH Plantations.</li>
</ul>
According to the RCI, investment decisions were often made through weak coordination and excessive reliance on recommendations from TH's own management, while ministers approved proposals without obtaining independent external advice.
Governance Failures And Political Influence
The report also highlighted broader governance weaknesses within TH.
Political appointments to the board between 2014 and 2018 were said to have undermined public confidence, while several senior executives simultaneously held numerous directorships across TH subsidiaries, creating potential conflicts of interest and reducing oversight.
The commission also criticised the growing financial burden of haj subsidies, which had been funded using TH's investment returns, placing additional pressure on its long-term financial sustainability.
Investigations To Continue
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/95c2c7b5e168ddaaf2459237f03410d72d4fbfb01384e1d504062f1b1db895ba" />
The RCI recommended 25 reforms, including stronger governance measures, forensic audits into selected investments, stricter board appointment criteria and limiting political involvement in TH's management.
It also called for immediate follow-up on police reports and referrals to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) involving allegations of corruption, document falsification and financial misconduct.
The Cabinet has since ordered enforcement agencies to continue investigations and take legal action against any parties found to have breached the law.
In response, Tabung Haji said the issues identified in the report related to the period before 2018 and maintained that significant improvements had since been implemented. According to TH, approximately 75% of the RCI's recommendations have already been carried out, with the remaining reforms currently underway.
The pilgrimage fund added that it has rebuilt its financial position, restored its reserves and recently announced a 3.5% profit distribution for the 2025 financial year &mdash; its highest hibah rate in eight years &mdash; while reaffirming its commitment to strengthening governance, protecting depositors and restoring public confidence.
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

Big bonuses, mounting losses and serious governance concerns take centre stage in the latest RCI findings.

4d708a585a4da78341b47b19697bc523f5fbd13ab241a936cfd1ca83b3842df8

RCI Reveals Tabung Haji Paid Generous Bonuses Despite Financial Losses

FIFA president Gianni Infantino is facing growing opposition after unveiling a controversial proposal to sell minority stakes in the commercial rights of the FIFA World Cup and other major tournaments to private investors.
The plan, which would create a new commercial entity known as FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE), has drawn fierce criticism from UEFA, national football associations, politicians and supporters, many of whom argue that football's biggest competition should not become an investment vehicle.
With FIFA's 211 member associations given until 19 September to decide whether to support the proposal, the debate has quickly become one of the biggest governance issues in world football.
What Is FIFA Proposing?
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/f3262b4559bdbcfa36b0ea81633d95f00b890266dad84b32110c02fd588da3d6" />
Under the proposal, FIFA would establish FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE), a separate company responsible for managing the commercial operations of the World Cup, Women's World Cup, Club World Cup and other FIFA competitions.
FFE would oversee areas such as broadcasting rights, sponsorships, ticket sales, licensing and event operations.
Although FIFA says it would retain majority ownership and continue to control football governance, competition formats, regulations and the international match calendar, it intends to sell up to 21% of the company to private investors, raising approximately US$4.2 billion.
The governing body values FFE at around US$20 billion, with investment firm Thrive Capital, led by Joshua Kushner, expected to head the investor group. Global banking giant JP Morgan is serving as FIFA's financial adviser on the project.
Infantino Promises Billions For Member Associations
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/f05414b81f9778aabc3ec7ae4bad1ff021c9dae8636c276f8c9364357c359762" />
Infantino has framed the proposal as a way to "democratise football" by redistributing more of the sport's commercial wealth to national football associations.
In a letter sent to all 211 FIFA member associations, he said countries that approve the proposal by 19 September could receive development funding worth up to US$40 million each during the 2027-2030 cycle.
This includes an immediate US$20 million payment from January 2027 through a new FIFA Fast-Forward Programme, alongside another US$20 million through FIFA's expanded Forward development programme.
Overall, FIFA says the initiative would unlock more than US$10 billion in football development funding over the coming years.
However, Infantino also warned that if the proposal is rejected, member associations would instead receive only the previously planned US$2.7 billion development package, amounting to around US$10 million per association.
The financial incentive has led critics to argue that member associations are effectively being pressured into backing the proposal.
UEFA Leads Fierce Opposition
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/63eb451756bbed1fecba81bda0c9e33648ea5a5c9edec080ff5aba81f6ce8c88" />
The strongest resistance has come from UEFA, which accused FIFA of crossing a line by attempting to commercialise football's most prestigious competitions.
In a strongly worded statement, UEFA said football's governance and heritage "are not assets to trade", adding that "none of us are the owners of football. It is not FIFA's to sell."
European football's governing body also criticised the lack of transparency surrounding the proposal, saying major stakeholders were not properly consulted before the plans became public.
UEFA has since convened discussions with its 55 member associations, with reports suggesting that some European nations are even considering the possibility of a boycott should the proposal proceed.
National Associations And Politicians Raise Concerns
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/22aafc594021d0e9b037197f26a895f1430c86ec4cdddbe87971745f10443852" />
Several national football associations, including the Football Association (FA) of England, said they had received virtually no information before news of the proposal emerged publicly.
The FA described itself as "deeply concerned" about both the process and governance behind the plan, saying it would reserve judgement until FIFA provides full details.
Similar concerns have been voiced by the Football Association of Wales, the Irish FA, CONCACAF, the Asian Football Confederation and numerous European football organisations.
Politicians have also entered the debate.
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/0a5f737a1583ed8d016acc32139c0a0d0c6900ba6406429ee8bdb69c80f15cdc" />
UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham argued that football belongs to supporters rather than investors, insisting that the World Cup "was never anyone's to sell".
La Liga president Javier Tebas similarly criticised the proposal, accusing Infantino of prioritising commercial interests over the sport itself.
Why Critics Are Worried
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/19ea94ced861132bc4d9a37b3dc61e068870623f03097b26a278c11e779f893c" />
Although FIFA insists that outside investors would only own minority stakes and have no control over football decisions, many critics believe commercial pressures could eventually influence how tournaments are organised.
There are concerns that investors seeking maximum returns may push FIFA to expand tournaments further, stage the World Cup more frequently, prioritise commercially attractive host nations or introduce additional revenue-generating changes.
Critics also argue that once private capital becomes financially invested in football's flagship competitions, protecting investor returns could gradually become a greater priority than preserving sporting integrity.
The involvement of Thrive Capital has also attracted scrutiny due to founder Joshua Kushner's family ties to US President Donald Trump, while Infantino's increasingly close relationship with Trump has further fuelled concerns about transparency.
Why Many Believe The Plan Could Still Pass
Despite the backlash across Europe, Infantino is still widely expected to secure enough support for the proposal.
Since becoming FIFA president in 2016, he has significantly increased development funding distributed to football associations across Africa, Asia, Oceania and the Americas.
Many smaller associations rely heavily on FIFA grants and could view the additional funding as too significant to reject.
Because FIFA proposals only require support from a simple majority of its 211 member associations, Infantino may have enough backing outside Europe for the proposal to succeed.
A Defining Moment For Football Governance
The proposal has become one of the most controversial initiatives of Infantino's presidency, raising wider questions about the future ownership and commercialisation of football.
Supporters argue that attracting private investment could generate unprecedented funding for football development around the world.
Opponents, however, believe football's greatest competition should never become an asset partly owned by investment firms, warning that commercial interests could eventually outweigh the interests of players, clubs and supporters.
With FIFA members set to vote by 19 September, the outcome could reshape how the World Cup is funded and managed for decades to come.
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

A billion-dollar proposal has sparked football's biggest backlash yet.

872fa6b64472e0d094874e901e9375c5d4a0e4a2fd84aeb0da27b3ede9a0faa9

FIFA's World Cup Sell-Off Plan Sparks Global Backlash As Infantino Pushes Multi-Billion-Dollar Proposal

A PKR lawmaker has urged the government to suspend Chinese e-commerce platform Pinduoduo&rsquo;s operations in Malaysia until a proper cross-border anti-dumping framework is introduced, arguing that the platform&rsquo;s business model could put local businesses at a disadvantage.
Gopeng MP Tan Kar Hing called on the government to consider removing Pinduoduo from app stores and delaying its operations until stronger regulations are established to ensure fair competition.
According to Tan, Pinduoduo&rsquo;s factory-to-consumer (F2C) model allows overseas manufacturers to sell directly to Malaysian consumers at prices that local businesses struggle to match. While Malaysian companies must bear costs such as taxes, product certifications, safety requirements, warehouse expenses and other regulatory obligations, overseas sellers can often operate with lower costs.
He warned that unchecked growth of cross-border e-commerce platforms could place pressure on local manufacturers, wholesalers and distributors, potentially affecting businesses, jobs and the wider economy.
What Is Pinduoduo And Why Is It So Cheap?
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/bc5e669073f084aef63bd0cb786d7c078573ece6bdd9872d424dda19ef67d536" />
Pinduoduo is one of China&rsquo;s largest e-commerce platforms, connecting consumers directly with manufacturers through a factory-to-consumer model. By reducing the number of middlemen involved in the supply chain, sellers are able to offer products at significantly lower prices compared with traditional retail channels.
For example, a household product sold by a Malaysian retailer for around RM13 could reportedly be listed on Pinduoduo for as little as RM2, including delivery from China.
Unlike platforms such as Shopee and Lazada, which mainly operate as marketplaces where local and international sellers run their own online stores, Pinduoduo focuses heavily on direct factory sales, bulk manufacturing and aggressive pricing strategies.
All three platforms offer products ranging from electronics and fashion to household goods and daily necessities. However, Pinduoduo&rsquo;s competitive advantage comes from its close connection with manufacturers, allowing consumers to purchase goods closer to factory prices.
While this benefits consumers looking for affordable products, some local businesses worry that they will struggle to compete against prices that may be difficult for domestic retailers to sustain.
Tan Claims Local SMEs Face An Uneven Playing Field
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/855fd062c172ed299944e7eb6903f416c2cde8f3081626ffff6579c23ef30be7" />
Tan argued that the issue goes beyond cheaper prices, claiming local businesses face higher compliance costs compared with some overseas sellers.
He said Malaysian companies are required to comply with regulations involving product certification, taxation, quality control and other operational requirements, while certain foreign platforms may not face the same level of obligations.
To address these concerns, Tan proposed several measures, including requiring overseas platforms to store Malaysian users&rsquo; data locally and encouraging partnerships with local manufacturers, suppliers and logistics companies.
He said such requirements could help ensure foreign platforms contribute to Malaysia&rsquo;s economy through technology transfer, industry development and support for local small and medium enterprises (SMEs), rather than only benefiting from Malaysian consumer spending.
Some Figures Cited By MP Face Scrutiny
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/1eed72f844944ff81f1c0c4fba1fae004f60809dcac27f343a8d58148a3f8dbc" />
While many agree that local businesses face growing pressure from low-cost overseas platforms, some statistics cited by Tan have been questioned.
Tan stated that SMEs make up 98% of Malaysian businesses and contribute &ldquo;nearly half&rdquo; of the country&rsquo;s GDP.
However, figures from SME Corp Malaysia show that SMEs account for around 96.1% of businesses nationwide, while contributing 39.5% of GDP. The figure closer to half relates to employment, with SMEs accounting for 48.7% of the workforce.
Tan also criticised cross-border platforms for avoiding taxes, although Malaysia introduced a 10% Low Value Goods (LVG) Tax on eligible imported online purchases from 1 January 2024.
The tax was introduced to reduce the gap between local and overseas sellers. However, concerns remain over differences in areas such as product certification, consumer protection requirements and regulatory compliance.
Debate Over Cross-Border E-Commerce Expected To Continue
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/0815cd06ee1eeee6023024669da35489d3e79e3412c648107591ab39e4d4fdff" />
Despite questions surrounding some of the figures used, Tan&rsquo;s concerns highlight a wider debate over how Malaysia should regulate rapidly expanding cross-border e-commerce platforms.
He stressed that his proposal is not aimed at rejecting foreign investment or digital platforms, but rather creating a fairer environment for local businesses to compete.
As platforms offering ultra-low prices continue to grow in Malaysia, policymakers will need to balance consumer demand for affordable goods with the need to protect local businesses and maintain a sustainable domestic retail ecosystem.
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

Could Pinduoduo be banned in Malaysia? PKR MP pushes for suspension over fair competition concerns.

60dd69e0559b27c2ecd698497d6e09f73738dd4bf33724b4ee92f6b38740d757

PKR MP Calls For Pinduoduo To Be Suspended Until Malaysia Introduces Anti-Dumping Safeguards

Global K-pop sensation BTS has announced that it will not submit any of its music for consideration at the 69th Annual Grammy Awards, a decision widely viewed as a response to the Recording Academy&rsquo;s newly introduced Best Asian Pop Music Performance category.
The seven-member group shared a joint statement across their individual social media accounts on Wednesday (29 July), saying they had chosen to sit out next year&rsquo;s awards despite being expected to receive several major nominations.
&ldquo;We have decided not to submit to the Grammys this year. We hope music can be heard and loved for what it is, rather than being divided by region or language.&rdquo;
The group also thanked their global fanbase, ARMY, and supporters for standing by them throughout their career.
Decision Comes After New Grammy Category Announcement
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/547d9f11ce26b7b22e6bc9a63557c057401f81eb622de86f22412bfb1ace54db" />
Although BTS did not directly mention the Recording Academy&rsquo;s new category, the timing of the announcement has led many fans and industry observers to interpret the move as a protest.
The Recording Academy unveiled the Best Asian Pop Music Performance award in June as part of several new categories for the 2027 Grammys. The category is intended to recognise artistic excellence in Asian pop music, including K-pop, J-pop and C-pop, for performances featuring meaningful use of one or more Asian languages.
According to the Recording Academy, the category was introduced to create more opportunities to celebrate different genres and artists from across Asia.
However, its introduction immediately sparked debate online, with critics arguing that it risks separating Asian artists from the main Grammy categories instead of recognising them alongside other global acts.
Fans Fear Asian Artists Are Being Boxed Into Separate Categories
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/fcd48bdea1b6a1d2d15c6669df3d179078fbc577df5555e1b01148d9a845b0a8" />
Many BTS fans believe the new category could unintentionally sideline Asian artists from prestigious awards such as Album of the Year, Record of the Year, and Song of the Year.
Supporters have argued that artists should compete based on the quality of their music rather than their nationality or language, echoing BTS' statement that music should not be defined by geographical or linguistic boundaries.
Some also questioned why a separate Asian Pop category was introduced now, particularly as BTS returned this year following the completion of their military service and were widely tipped to be strong contenders in several major Grammy categories.
A Strong Comeback Year For BTS
<iframe style="border-radius: 12px;" src="https://open.spotify.com/embed/album/3ukkRHDHbN8tNRPKsGZR1h?utm_source=generator&amp;si=e470903e77a44abd" width="100%" height="352" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" loading="lazy" data-testid="embed-iframe"></iframe>
The announcement comes despite one of the biggest years of BTS' career.
The group's comeback album, Arirang, released in March, became a major commercial success, topping the Billboard 200 chart and earning widespread critical acclaim. Lead single Swim also enjoyed significant chart success, with many predicting it would be among the frontrunners for Grammy nominations.
BTS has also been selling out its world tour, with concerts across South Korea, North America and Europe attracting overwhelming demand. Earlier this year, the group also won Artist of the Year at the American Music Awards, beating several international stars.
BTS' Grammy Journey
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/55bc67cb8c1d5cb9672a859181692ba901b70a0a8de667105966ac6da04d5730" />
BTS became the first K-pop group to receive a Grammy nomination in 2021 with Dynamite, marking a significant milestone for Korean music on the global stage.
Since then, the group has received multiple Grammy nominations across both group and solo projects and has performed at the awards ceremony several times. However, despite their international success, they have yet to win a Grammy.
The seven members are also voting members of the Recording Academy.
HYBE Denies Boycott Claims
Following the announcement, HYBE clarified that BTS' decision was not part of a wider company boycott of the Grammys.
Instead, the label said the group made the decision collectively in order to "protect the status and pride of the K-pop industry as a whole."
The Recording Academy has yet to issue an official response to BTS' decision.
While BTS will not be competing at the 2027 Grammy Awards, their announcement has reignited discussions about how international artists are recognised by major Western award ceremonies and whether music should continue to be categorised by region or language.
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

BTS are sitting out the 2027 Grammys, with many viewing the move as a stand against the Recording Academy's new Asian Pop category.

c86b7b877e6b509cc0e8857b85eb5a0125a217fdc9e692bfe2774d9211e34979

BTS Decline Grammy 2027 Consideration Following Introduction Of New ‘Best Asian Pop’ Category

Tesla owners in Malaysia will now have to pay to use the brand&rsquo;s Destination Chargers after nearly three years of complimentary charging, while the government has confirmed there is currently no price ceiling on public EV charging rates.
Beginning 28 July 2026, Tesla has introduced a flat charging fee of RM0.88 per kWh across its nationwide network of Destination Chargers, marking the end of one of the key ownership perks offered since the company entered the Malaysian market.
The announcement comes as the Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry (MITI) confirmed that public EV charging operators are free to determine their own pricing, with no government-imposed cap currently in place.
Tesla Destination Chargers No Longer Free
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/aa42a2b0bd65cab98fdc527fe530651579276aa1f182176d943fb6ff394d4d34" />
Tesla&rsquo;s Destination Chargers are AC charging points typically located at shopping malls, hotels and commercial buildings, allowing owners to top up their vehicles while parked for several hours.
Since the network was launched in Malaysia in late 2023, charging at these stations had been free for Tesla owners. That has now changed, with all 75 Destination Chargers across 18 locations nationwide now charging RM0.88 per kWh.
Locations affected include popular destinations such as Pavilion Bukit Jalil, The Gardens Mall, IOI City Mall Putrajaya, Bangsar Shopping Centre, Sunway Velocity, Pavilion Damansara Heights, Quayside Mall and several others.
Still Cheaper Than Most Public AC Chargers
&nbsp;<img src="https://r2.myc.my/13cc31c7bb098f7aa782bceb23424b5648bec8046ec2c7f076edb9a8582b8fbc" />
Although charging is no longer complimentary, Tesla's new pricing remains competitive.
At RM0.88 per kWh, it is still slightly below the current market rate for public 11kW AC chargers, which generally ranges between RM1.00 and RM1.10 per kWh, with some operators charging even more.
Tesla's Superchargers, which provide significantly faster DC charging, are priced separately under a time-based pricing structure. Depending on the location and time of day, charging at a Supercharger can even cost less than RM1.00 per kWh during off-peak hours.
For those looking for the lowest charging costs, home charging remains the most economical option. Under Tenaga Nasional Berhad's domestic electricity tariff, charging at home typically costs around RM0.50 per kWh, depending on household electricity usage.
A Move That Could Reduce Charger Hogging
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/d82457cbfd3c727bc23651e7e2544cdbb3bc926d97a66c39bf505c80ec8712bd" />
The introduction of charging fees is also expected to improve charger availability.
When Destination Chargers were free, some owners reportedly left their vehicles plugged in long after charging had finished, effectively using the charging bays as reserved parking spaces for extended periods.
By attaching a cost to charging, Tesla is hoping drivers will be more likely to move their vehicles once charging is complete, allowing more owners to access the facilities when needed.
Government Confirms There Is No Price Ceiling
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/7088a625d51b2096f50cd3c9bccb2ee2920dd902b4c1d477111280177934fc91" />
The pricing change comes as MITI clarified that Malaysia does not currently regulate public EV charging fees.
In a written reply in the Dewan Negara, the ministry confirmed that charging rates are determined entirely by individual charging point operators based on their own commercial considerations. The response was given after Senator Robert Lau Hui Yew asked whether EV charging prices were subject to government regulation or a pricing framework.
While operators are free to set their own charging fees, MITI stressed that charging infrastructure must still comply with technical standards, safety requirements and licensing rules enforced by the ministry, the Energy Commission and relevant local authorities.
Malaysia's EV Charging Network Continues To Expand
<img src="https://r2.myc.my/ea4a907ebdf3c26a9b593c915d20257e3df2c6112147dba4e7e5e3d918f3774a" />
MITI also revealed that Malaysia had 6,416 public EV chargers nationwide as of 31 May 2026.
Of these:
<ul>
<li>2,143 units (33.4%) are DC fast chargers.</li>
<li>4,273 units (66.6%) are AC chargers.</li>
</ul>
The vast majority are located in Peninsular Malaysia, which accounts for 6,176 chargers, while Sarawak has 208 and Sabah has 32.
The government said allowing operators to determine their own prices is intended to encourage greater private sector investment and competition, helping accelerate the rollout of charging infrastructure across the country.
A Regulatory Framework May Still Be Introduced
Although charging prices remain unregulated for now, MITI said it is working with the Energy Commission and Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) to develop a regulatory framework for EV charging fees in the future.
The ministry added that it aims to strike a balance between maintaining an attractive environment for private investment while ensuring wider access to public charging infrastructure.
For the time being, however, EV charging prices remain entirely at the discretion of individual operators, meaning companies such as Tesla can determine their own charging rates without government-imposed price controls.
&nbsp;
*Sources: Visual and Reference Credits to Social Media &amp; various cross-references for context.
FOMO much? Follow our&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.facebook.com/mycclub/">Facebook</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a style="color: #ff0000;" href="https://www.instagram.com/myc_news/?hl=en">Instagram</a>&nbsp;for more updates.

Tesla has ended complimentary Destination Charging in Malaysia, with no government cap currently in place for public EV charging rates.

Singaporean Driver Fined RM20,000 After Illegally Filling Up With Subsidised RON95 Petrol In Johor

A cheaper tank of petrol turned into a RM20,000 lesson for one Singaporean driver.

Latest News

RCI Reveals Tabung Haji Paid Generous Bonuses Despite Financial Losses

FIFA's World Cup Sell-Off Plan Sparks Global Backlash As Infantino Pushes Multi-Billion-Dollar Proposal

PKR MP Calls For Pinduoduo To Be Suspended Until Malaysia Introduces Anti-Dumping Safeguards

BTS Decline Grammy 2027 Consideration Following Introduction Of New ‘Best Asian Pop’ Category

Tesla Ends Free Destination Charging In Malaysia As Government Confirms No Cap On EV Charging Prices

Related Articles

RCI Reveals Tabung Haji Paid Generous Bonuses Despite Financial Losses

FIFA's World Cup Sell-Off Plan Sparks Global Backlash As Infantino Pushes Multi-Billion-Dollar Proposal

PKR MP Calls For Pinduoduo To Be Suspended Until Malaysia Introduces Anti-Dumping Safeguards

BTS Decline Grammy 2027 Consideration Following Introduction Of New ‘Best Asian Pop’ Category

Tesla Ends Free Destination Charging In Malaysia As Government Confirms No Cap On EV Charging Prices

Related Articles

RCI Reveals Tabung Haji Paid Generous Bonuses Despite Financial Losses

FIFA's World Cup Sell-Off Plan Sparks Global Backlash As Infantino Pushes Multi-Billion-Dollar Proposal

PKR MP Calls For Pinduoduo To Be Suspended Until Malaysia Introduces Anti-Dumping Safeguards

BTS Decline Grammy 2027 Consideration Following Introduction Of New ‘Best Asian Pop’ Category

Tesla Ends Free Destination Charging In Malaysia As Government Confirms No Cap On EV Charging Prices